Speak To A Criminal Defense Attorney Now
(919) 845-6688
Schedule A Free Consultation
Speak To A Criminal Defense Attorney Now
(919) 845-6688
Schedule A Free Consultation
We’d like to take the time to congratulate our very own, Bill Finn, for being recognized as a top Criminal Defense Lawyer in the Raleigh, NC area. Bill has earned a 9.6 “Superb” rating by Avvo, an online legal resource that assesses a lawyer’s background, experience, client reviews and case successes.
With the start of the new school year, what better time than now to review the rules and regulations pertaining to stopped school busses. How are school busses different from that of other busses? The definition of a school bus includes the transportation of children, school personnel or senior citizens and only applies in the event that the words “school bus” are plainly visible on the front and rear of the bus.
We’re frequently asked… Can a police officer be wrong and get away with it? A recent North Carolina case posed this exact question and the outcome may surprise you. On December 15, 2014, in the decision of Heien v. North Carolina, United States Supreme Court Justices ruled that a police officer could make a seizure based on his belief that an individual was breaking the law… even if the officer’s belief was incorrect.
As Legislature reconvenes in 2015, a bill is expected to be introduced that will require North Carolina police officers to wear a body camera while they are on duty. This bill is in response to the recent police-involved deaths of Michael Brown in Ferguson, Missouri and Eric Garner in New York City, New York.
On June 25, 2014 the US Supreme Court handed down a landmark 9-0 decision in Riley v. California which now requires law enforcement to obtain a warrant before they can search a cellphone. Previously, police officers have relied on the “search incident to arrest” doctrine to access and search cellphones ranging from flip phones to smartphones at the time of arrest without a warrant.
An interesting case is currently taking place in Wisconsin concerning Miranda Rights, also referred to as Miranda Rule and Miranda Warning. A woman accused of kidnapping her half-sister’s baby is claiming the FBI did not read her her rights and therefore, none of the evidence gathered during her first day in custody should be used against her. The woman claims the FBI did not let her have an attorney while she was questioned. Her attorney is now moving to suppress all of the statements she made to the FBI during her questioning.
A scenario we frequently encounter with clients is one in which a police officer stops a car occupied by multiple people and drugs are found within the vehicle. Often times all passengers will be charged with possession of drugs, even though the drugs are owned by only one of the occupants. You may ask yourself: How can it be fairly determined whether or not all passengers were actually in possession?
In an effort to increase public safety, questions have been raised as to whether or not an anonymous tip can be enough evidence to supply an officer with reasonable suspicion to stop a vehicle. Until recently, the answer to that question was no. In previous cases held by the North Carolina Supreme Court, as well as the United States Supreme Court, an anonymous tip alone rarely provides enough reason to stop a vehicle.
More than 40 New Laws were put into effect on December 1, 2013, many were increased to a criminal offense status. Included in laws which impose more severe penalties is the firing of a gun in an enclosed space, whether to do harm or incite fear. The penalty review of this law was prompted by a gun incident in October 2012, when 20-year-old Justin Murphy walked into a Wal-Mart in Kernersville, NC and opened gun fire. No one was injured.